Public Lands and Access
NANPA Opposes a Colorado Permit for Selling Wildlife Photographs
With ASMP, NANPA asked the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to deny a petition that would require an annual state permit before anyone sells or licenses an image of wildlife.
On the Record
Comments Submitted
- Submitted
- August 27, 2026
- Agency
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission
- Filed By
- ASMP and NANPA
On This Page

© Donna Fullerton · Mammals, Top 100 · NANPA Showcase 2025
On August 27, NANPA and ASMP submitted comments asking the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to deny a citizen petition for an annual Wildlife Photographer/Artist Permit. It would apply before anyone sells, licenses, or commercially distributes a depiction of wildlife under the agency’s jurisdiction, anywhere in the state, including images made on private property. Civil and criminal penalties are proposed for violations.
What the Permit Would Cost Each Year
- Colorado resident · Individual
- $35
- Nonresident · Individual
- $100
- Commercial entity · Including a photographer’s LLC
- $250
There is no minimum revenue threshold. A single print sale, a greeting card, an old image later licensed to a magazine, or a wildlife-themed item sold by a small nonprofit could trigger the permit. (Comments, p. 4)
What NANPA and ASMP Asked the Commission
A Content-Based Burden on Protected Expression
Requiring government permission to sell or license a photograph because of what it depicts raises serious First Amendment concerns. Selling an image does not strip it of protection.
Comments, p. 2Wildlife Authority Does Not Reach Art
The agency manages wildlife. The petition would stretch that power into a licensing system for photographs and artwork.
Comments, p. 2Rules Should Follow Impact
ASMP and NANPA support enforceable rules against disturbing wildlife or damaging habitat. The federal FILM Act already ties permits to a crew’s effect on the land, not to whether an image earns money.
Comments, p. 3Unworkable and Unsupported
The petition sets no revenue threshold, leaves basic enforcement questions open, and offers no evidence that selling wildlife images harms wildlife.
Comments, p. 4
“You do not conserve wildlife by charging people for pictures of wildlife.”
Why It Matters to Nature Photographers
The permit would reach prints, stock licenses, and merchandise, and it would treat the sale of an image as the problem rather than any harm to animals or habitat. Photographs are how many people see wildlife and wild places they will never visit, and the petition would weaken that connection.
- Photographers NANPA and ASMP Represent
- 7,500+
- Nature and Wildlife Photographers Among Them
- ~1,800
Credits
Howard Paul, president of ASMP Colorado, first brought the petition to ASMP National’s attention. The ASMP Colorado chapter also filed its own comments and helped bring photographers’ concerns to the Commission.
Share This Matter
The existing NANPA share kit includes graphics and suggested post text.
Download the existing share kit
The Submitted Document
Comments of ASMP and NANPA
Submitted August 27, 2026 to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission.
PDF · 5 pages · Original submitted comments