Advocacy

NANPA Opposes a Colorado Permit for Selling Wildlife Photographs

By September 12, 2026October 11th, 2026No Comments

Public Lands and Access

NANPA Opposes a Colorado Permit for Selling Wildlife Photographs

With ASMP, NANPA asked the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to deny a petition that would require an annual state permit before anyone sells or licenses an image of wildlife.

On the Record

Comments Submitted

Submitted
August 27, 2026
Agency
Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission
Filed By
ASMP and NANPA
On This Page
Two gray wild stallions fight in a cloud of dust in Sand Wash Basin as other horses look on.
“Orfeo Vs Kanthaka” · Sand Wash Basin, Maybell, Colorado
© Donna Fullerton · Mammals, Top 100 · NANPA Showcase 2025

On August 27, NANPA and ASMP submitted comments asking the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to deny a citizen petition for an annual Wildlife Photographer/Artist Permit. It would apply before anyone sells, licenses, or commercially distributes a depiction of wildlife under the agency’s jurisdiction, anywhere in the state, including images made on private property. Civil and criminal penalties are proposed for violations.

What the Permit Would Cost Each Year

Colorado resident · Individual
$35
Nonresident · Individual
$100
Commercial entity · Including a photographer’s LLC
$250

There is no minimum revenue threshold. A single print sale, a greeting card, an old image later licensed to a magazine, or a wildlife-themed item sold by a small nonprofit could trigger the permit. (Comments, p. 4)

What NANPA and ASMP Asked the Commission

  1. A Content-Based Burden on Protected Expression

    Requiring government permission to sell or license a photograph because of what it depicts raises serious First Amendment concerns. Selling an image does not strip it of protection.

    Comments, p. 2
  2. Wildlife Authority Does Not Reach Art

    The agency manages wildlife. The petition would stretch that power into a licensing system for photographs and artwork.

    Comments, p. 2
  3. Rules Should Follow Impact

    ASMP and NANPA support enforceable rules against disturbing wildlife or damaging habitat. The federal FILM Act already ties permits to a crew’s effect on the land, not to whether an image earns money.

    Comments, p. 3
  4. Unworkable and Unsupported

    The petition sets no revenue threshold, leaves basic enforcement questions open, and offers no evidence that selling wildlife images harms wildlife.

    Comments, p. 4
“You do not conserve wildlife by charging people for pictures of wildlife.”
Thomas Maddrey, ASMP CEO, in the comments submitted for ASMP and NANPA (p. 5)

Why It Matters to Nature Photographers

The permit would reach prints, stock licenses, and merchandise, and it would treat the sale of an image as the problem rather than any harm to animals or habitat. Photographs are how many people see wildlife and wild places they will never visit, and the petition would weaken that connection.

Photographers NANPA and ASMP Represent
7,500+
Nature and Wildlife Photographers Among Them
~1,800

Credits

Howard Paul, president of ASMP Colorado, first brought the petition to ASMP National’s attention. The ASMP Colorado chapter also filed its own comments and helped bring photographers’ concerns to the Commission.

The Submitted Document

Comments of ASMP and NANPA

Submitted August 27, 2026 to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission.

Share This Matter

The existing NANPA share kit includes graphics and suggested post text.

Download the existing share kit